000 03139namaa2200445uu 4500
001 doab135453
003 oapen
005 20260305123954.0
006 m o d
007 cr|mn|---annan
008 240308s2024 xx |||||o ||| 0|eng d
020 _a9780367684341
020 _a9780367684358
020 _a9781003137528
020 _a9781003137528
024 7 _a10.4324/9781003137528
_2doi
040 _aoapen
_coapen
041 0 _aeng
042 _adc
072 7 _aAGA
_2bicssc
720 1 _aBałus, Wojciech
_4edt
245 0 0 _aArt Historiography and Iconologies Between West and East
260 _bTaylor & Francis
_c2024
300 _a1 online resource
336 _atext
_btxt
_2rdacontent
337 _acomputer
_bc
_2rdamedia
338 _aonline resource
_bcr
_2rdacarrier
490 1 _aStudies in Art Historiography
506 0 _aFree-to-read
_fUnrestricted online access
_2star
520 _aThis volume explores a basic question in the historiography of art: the extent to which iconology was a homogenous research method in its own immutable right. By contributing to the rejection of the universalizing narrative, these case studies argue that there were many strands of iconology. Methods that differed from the 'canonised' approach of Panofsky were proposed by Godefridus Johannes Hoogewerff and Hans Sedlmayr. Researchers affiliated with the Warburg Institute in London also chose to distance themselves from Panofsky's work. Poland, in turn, was the breeding ground for yet another distinct variety of iconology. In Communist Czechoslovakia there were attempts to develop a 'Marxist iconology'. This book, written by recognized experts in the field, examines these and other major strands of iconology, telling the tale of iconology's reception in the countries formerly behind the Iron Curtain. Attitudes there ranged from enthusiastic acceptance in Poland, to critical reception in the Soviet Union, to reinterpretation in Czechoslovakia and the German Democratic Republic, and, finally, to outright rejection in Romania. The book will be of interest to scholars working in art history, visual studies, and historiography.
540 _aAll rights reserved
_uhttp://oapen.org/content/about-rights
546 _aEnglish
650 7 _aHistory of art
_2bicssc
653 _aart history,iconology,center,centre,periphery,Poland,methodology,politics,Warburg Institute,communism,Europe,Marxism,Soviet Union,Soviet bloc,social realism,Estonia,Czechoslovakia,German Democratic Republic,Germany,Romania,Western Europe,Eastern Europe,art historian,intellectual history,oppression,Central Europe,architecture,Godefridus Johannes Hoogewerff,Ernst H. Kantorowicz,Hans Sedlmayr,Jan Białostocki,Zofia Ameisenowa,Lech Kalinowski,Erwin Panofsky,Mikhail Liebmann,Mikhail Sokolov,Prague,Helga Sciurie,Jena,Friedrich Mobius
720 1 _aBałus, Wojciech
_4oth
720 1 _aKunińska, Magdalena
_4edt
720 1 _aKunińska, Magdalena
_4oth
793 0 _aDOAB Library.
856 4 0 _uhttps://directory.doabooks.org/handle/20.500.12854/135453
_70
_zFree-to-read: DOAB: description of the publication
999 _c93271
_d93271