000 03017namaa2200397uu 4500
001 doab64617
003 oapen
005 20260305123949.0
006 m o d
007 cr|mn|---annan
008 210415s2016 xx |||||o ||| 0|eng d
020 _a9780190280307
020 _aacprof:oso/9780190280307.001.0001
024 7 _a10.1093/acprof:oso/9780190280307.001.0001
_2doi
040 _aoapen
_coapen
041 0 _aeng
042 _adc
072 7 _aPSAN
_2bicssc
720 1 _aSinnott-Armstrong, Walter
_4edt
245 0 0 _aFinding Consciousness
_bThe Neuroscience, Ethics, and Law of Severe Brain Damage
260 _aOxford
_bOxford University Press
_c2016
300 _a1 online resource
336 _atext
_btxt
_2rdacontent
337 _acomputer
_bc
_2rdamedia
338 _aonline resource
_bcr
_2rdacarrier
490 1 _aOxford Series in Neuroscience, Law & Philosophy
506 0 _aFree-to-read
_fUnrestricted online access
_2star
520 _aModern medicine enables us to keep many people alive after they have suffered severe brain damage and show no reliable outward signs of consciousness. Many such patients are misdiagnosed as being in a permanent vegetative state when they are actually in a minimally conscious state. This mistake has far-reaching implications for treatment and prognosis. To alleviate this problem, neuroscientists have recently developed new brain-scanning methods for detecting consciousness in some of these patients and even for asking them questions, including "Do you want to stay alive?" These new technological abilities raise many questions about what exactly these methods reveal (Is it really consciousness?), how reliable they are (Do they fail to detect consciousness in some patients who are conscious?), what these patients' lives are like (Do they feel pain?), what we should do for and to these patients (Should we let them die?), who should decide (Are these patients competent to decide for themselves?), and which policies should governments and hospitals enact (Which kinds of treatment should be made available?). All of these questions and more are addressed in this collection of original papers. The prominent contributors provide background information, survey the issues and positions, and take controversial stands from a wide variety of perspectives, including neuroscience and neurology, law and policy, and philosophy and ethics. This collection should interest not only academics but anyone who might suffer brain damage, which includes us all.
540 _aAll rights reserved
_uhttp://oapen.org/content/about-rights
546 _aEnglish
650 7 _aNeurosciences
_2bicssc
653 _aconsciousness, vegetative state, minimally conscious state, death, disability, pain, brain damage, neuroscience, fMRI, ethics
720 1 _aSinnott-Armstrong, Walter
_4oth
793 0 _aDOAB Library.
856 4 0 _uhttps://directory.doabooks.org/handle/20.500.12854/64617
_70
_zFree-to-read: DOAB: description of the publication
999 _c92903
_d92903