000			02236namaa2200409uu 4500
001			doab68195
003			oapen
005			20260305123947.0
006			m o d
007			cr|mn|---annan
008			210427s2019 xx |||||o ||| 0|eng d
020			_a9781509924912
040			_aoapen _coapen
041	0		_aeng
042			_adc
072		7	_aMB _2bicssc
720	1		_aGoold, Imogen _4edt
245	0	0	_aParental Rights, Best Interests and Significant Harms _bMedical decision-making on behalf of children post Great Ormond St vs Yates
260			_aOxford _bHart Publishers _c2019
300			_a1 online resource
336			_atext _btxt _2rdacontent
337			_acomputer _bc _2rdamedia
338			_aonline resource _bcr _2rdacarrier
506	0		_aFree-to-read _fUnrestricted online access _2star
520			_aThis timely collection brings together philosophical, legal and sociological perspectives on the crucial question of who should make decisions about the fate of a child suffering from a serious illness. In particular, the collection looks at whether the current 'best interests' threshold is the appropriate boundary for legal intervention, or whether it would be more appropriate to adopt the 'risk of significant harm' approach proposed in Gard. It explores the roles of parents, doctors and the courts in making decisions on behalf of children, actively drawing on perspectives from the clinic as well as academia and practice. In doing so, it teases out the potential risks of inappropriate state intrusion in parental decision-making, and considers how we might address them.
540			_aAll rights reserved _uhttp://oapen.org/content/about-rights
546			_aEnglish
650		7	_aMedicine: general issues _2bicssc
653			_aparental rights; philosophical perspectives; child; serious illness; legal perspectives; sociological perspectives
720	1		_aAuckland, Cressida _4edt
720	1		_aAuckland, Cressida _4oth
720	1		_aGoold, Imogen _4oth
720	1		_aHerring, Jonathan _4edt
720	1		_aHerring, Jonathan _4oth
793	0		_aDOAB Library.
856	4	0	_uhttps://directory.doabooks.org/handle/20.500.12854/68195 _70 _zFree-to-read: DOAB: description of the publication
999			_c92811 _d92811