03072namaa2200517uu 4500001001000000003000600010005001700016006001900033007001500052008004100067020001800108020001800126020001800144040001700162041000800179042000700187072001600194072001600210072001600226072001600242072001600258072001500274720002500289245007400314260002700388300002200415336002600437337002600463338003600489490004800525506005100573520133000624540006301954546001202017650002802029650003502057650003502092650005902127650004002186650005002226653010202276720002502378793001802403856011602421999001702537doab94230oapen20260305123954.0m     o  d        cr|mn|---annan221124s2023    xx |||||o     ||| 0|eng d  a9781003294085  a9781032277868  a9781032277882  aoapencoapen0 aeng  adc 7aMBN2bicssc 7aMJC2bicssc 7aMKV2bicssc 7aRNC2bicssc 7aVFD2bicssc 7aWN2bicssc1 aBraverman, Irus4edt00aMore-than-One HealthbHumans, Animals, and the Environment Post-COVID  bTaylor & Francisc2023  a1 online resource  atextbtxt2rdacontent  acomputerbc2rdamedia  aonline resourcebcr2rdacarrier1 aRoutledge Studies in Environment and Health0 aFree-to-readfUnrestricted online access2star  aThe call for a One Health approach that transcends species and disciplinary boundaries assumes that human and veterinary medicine are discrete, distinctive domains whose separation must be overcome to achieve health benefits for all. This paper will problematize this assumption by demonstrating that until relatively recently, their boundaries were extremely fluid. Referring to specific examples over the period 1790-1900, it demonstrates that human medicine was once deeply zoological, and encompassed a host of species, practices and social relations that overlapped with those of veterinary medicine. While One Health today focusses selectively on animals as transmitters of zoonotic diseases or as experimental models of human disease, past animal participants in medicine were far more than that. As victims of naturally occurring diseases, they enabled doctors to think generically and comparatively about medical and biological problems, while as disease subjects they encouraged clinical interventions. Their investigation and management could prompt collaboration between doctors and vets. However, veterinary ambitions also encouraged competition. In time, this led to the hardening of boundaries between the professions and their subjects, and subsequent efforts to transcend them under the banner of One Health.  aAll rights reserveduhttp://oapen.org/content/about-rights  aEnglish 7aApplied ecology2bicssc 7aDiseases and disorders2bicssc 7aEnvironmental medicine2bicssc 7aNature and the natural world: general interest2bicssc 7aPopular medicine and health2bicssc 7aPublic health and preventive medicine2bicssc  aOne Health; One Medicine; comparative pathology; veterinary medicine; Britain; nineteenth century1 aBraverman, Irus4oth0 aDOAB Library.40uhttps://directory.doabooks.org/handle/20.500.12854/9423070zFree-to-read: DOAB: description of the publication  c93239d93239